Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendants Aenta, Inc., Aetna Life Insurance Company, and SAP America, Inc. (SAP America) (collectively, Defendants) to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiff California Spine and Neurosurgery Institute (Plaintiff). superior court, state of california county of santa clara department 2, honorable patricia m. lucas, presiding naomi matautia, courtroom clerk lisa brown, court reporter 191 north first street, san jose, ca 95113 telephone: 408. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, VS MYISHA WASHINGTON, STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING, INC. V. CITY OF MONTEREY, SEYED SADEGHI VS GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, RICHARD BRANNAN ET AL VS KAISER PERMANENTE ET AL. AND CASE NAMES MARK GOMEZ VS. MARIIA KRAVCHUK VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC. GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION ET AL. 6 asks the responding party to: IDENTIFY all payments m MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT Plaintiffs, 16 SERVICES USA CORPORATION, a Delaware 6 If you are seeing last week's tentative rulings, you may need to refresh your browser or force your browser's cache to clear. 25 According to the allegations of the 8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 16 V. STEPHEN LAM, ET AL. Department 2 is located in Downtown Superior Court (DTS), 191 North First Street in San Jose.. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. 13 VENCLOSE INC., a Delaware Corporation, 14 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: APPLICATION TO APPEAR PRO HAC 15 vs. VICE; DEMURRER TO FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT 16 COVIDIEN LP, COVIDIEN HOLDING INC., DATE: 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBE . 15 SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. BHAGIRATH DESAI ET AL VS OMKAR ROCKLIN, INC. On May 11, 2017, plaintiff Orion Listug (Orion) was riding his bicycle in the bicycle lane on Central Expressway in Mountain View, California. The tentative rulings will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the court day before the matter is heard by accessing the court's public access site or by telephoning the clerk at 916-874-7858 for Department 53 and 916-874-7848 for Department 54. Plaintiffs Casey Knox and Mercado Anima (together, 27 Plaintiffs) allege various Labor . ((See Declaration of (Richard J. V. CITY OF SANTA CLARA, ET AL. V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. LORIE ANN GUZMAN V. MANDARICH LAW GROUP, LLP, ET AL. Prior to the scheduled hearing of a Law and Motion, Complex Civil Litigation or a Discovery matter, the Court may issue a tentative ruling, in the discretion of the judge. 17 DOES 1-100, inclusive, Last. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 23 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. INTRODUCTION Background and Discovery Dispute For directions on how to appear through MS Teams, please refer to the courtsCivil Independent Calendar Hearingswebpage. RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL. 12 In re McAFEE, INC. 2001) 261 F.3d 912, . 16 York corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, V. INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL NUMBER 3, CATO V. ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY SERVICES. 18CV328572, 19CV343607], REPRESENTACIONES Y CONTROL ADMINSTRATIVO S.A. DE C.V. VS YAANA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION [LEAD CASE; CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE NOS. According to the separate statement in support of said motion SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO. Tentative rulings may be accessed on the 24 These cross-actions arise from an accident on a construction worksite in which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was injured. INTRODUCTION Background MERLINDA KALALANG VS KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ET AL. GRIEGO V. THE TEHAMA LAW GROUP, P.C., ET AL. Background CASE NO. 12 PERLA GUADALUPE SILVA MAGANA, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. 24 I. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Case no. 16 CENTER; NEW WORLD HEALTH STAFFING Civil Law and Motion Tentative Rulings are usually available the . Code of Civ. 12 KORBIN WILSON and MATTHEW BURNHAM, as individuals, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated and TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION the State of California as a private attorney FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 general, CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 Plaintiffs, MICHAEL SCHMITZ ET AL VS HEALTHIQ RE, INC. ALPHA OMEGA HOUSE CORPORATION VS THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, LABOR COMMISSIONER FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA V. CANTON PROSPECT INC., ET. 17 GREGORY L. SIMENDINGER, individually and DISCOVERY RESPONSES 15 Check Jury Reporting Status. http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) before the hearing. VEOLIA TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC V. ALL METALS, INC., ET AL. 21 ADMINISTRATION OF THE FEDERATED 16 a Delaware limited liability company; and DOES ABRAHAM OSEGUERA, ET AL. SUPERIOR COURT VS. FRANKS CASE NO CVDATE MARCH TIME AM LINE NUMBER. LAWRENCE HASHA, ET AL. SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL POLLO 16 VASONA MANAGEMENT, INC., a California Family Law, Family Preservation Court, Domestic Violence Restraining and Civil Harassment Restraining Orders. corporation; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Click on the Judge's name below for more details. Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing or appear without notice to the Court and opposing counsel will not be heard. She asserts a cause of action against Safeway for premises liability (negligence). Factual and Procedural Background : 20CV368229 Pacific Office Designs, Inc. v. Spot On Consulting Group, et al. This is a class action arising from allegations that defendant Laptalo Enterprises, Inc. dba JL Precision imposed illegal time rounding and break policies on its employees. Check your tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument. 10 MCGILL V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL. Thank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 3, Complex Civil Litigation, Judge Patricia M. Lucas presiding. 23 I. Civil Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing Family Law /Probate Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6607 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing No Tentative Rulings Provided For: Criminal Matters SHANNON SANCHEZ V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC., ET AL. You will need the free Adobe Acrobat Reader to view and print certain rulings. V. PAUL ALEXANDER DASILVA, ET AL. 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, f alendar Line 3 RESPONSES Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. 23 I. If the tentative ruling does not require appearances, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: Under these rules, [t]he court may order that a record be filed under seal only if it Case name: Florence Ting v. Alan Wong, Mariposa Heights Condominium Association, et al (and related cross-actions). 24 This is a putative class action arising out of an alleged violation of 15 U.S.C. To Join Department 23 Zoom By Phone Call 1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose) Enter Meeting ID 854-4114-2253. Defendant Menlo Land & Capital II, LLC (Menlo or Defendant) demurs to the First Amended Complaint (FAC) filed by plaintiff Pure Storage, Inc. (Plaintiff). HAN'S SAN JOSE HOSPITALITY, LLC VS LE HOLDINGS (BEIJING) CO., LTD ET AL, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. Plaintiff Elle W. Ko (Ko) was sexually assaulted at defendant Shawn Mackenzies (Mackenzie) business, Vivre Fitness, by an employee named Delmar Richard Robertson (Robertson). 16 Defendant. If you do not so notify the parties and court, the tentative ruling shall become the final ruling. 18CV327382]. 8 Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. On June 16, 2016, plaintiff Paul Ervin (Plaintiff) was traveling on Interstate 880 near The Alameda exit in San Jose, when a vehicle owned and operated by defendants Porchezhiyan Madhavan (husband) and Indumathy Dakshinamurthy (wife) (collectively, Defendants) rear-ended Plaintiffs vehicl Demurrer of Defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. 15 KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. 6. V. ARASH PADIDAR, ET AL. I. EFREN DELA CRUZ, ET AL. INTRODUCTION Parties may appear remotely using Zoom. INTRODUCTION 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Background 16 HEALTHIQ RE, INC., a California corporation; THE RANCH GOLF CLUB, PURE STORAGE, INC. V. MENLO LAND & CAPITAL II, LLC, MARIE ARNOLD V. SANTA CLARA COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT. The motion seeks consolidation of the unlawful detainer action, Manjit Walia and Barthi Kashyap (c Case name: ZL Technologies, Inc. et al. V. NGUYEN, ET AL. LLC, et al. 50, inclusive, 2 14 21 I. INTRODUCTION CLARK PACIFIC V. SC BUILDERS, INC., ET AL. MENDOZA V. PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE, INC. KENNETH ROSENBERG V. BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC, SUNPOWER CORPORATION VS MARTIN DEBONO ET AL, CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INST. SANTA CLARA COUNTY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION V. SHAHEEN, FOURFRONT SALES, INC. VS FINISAR CORPORATION, UBIQUITI NETWORKS, INC. V. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE CO. OF PITTSBURGH, PA. KEVIN CHRISTIAN ET AL. 12 DAVID CHAI, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, TO COMPEL ARBITRATION; 14 MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER vs. ROBERT DURHAM V. STEVEN WINEGARDEN, ET AL. BRIAN CROOK, ET AL. BRIAN PETERS V. RFI ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. 5 corporation; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, DOES 1 through 100, in 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 13, Honorable James L. Stoelker, Presiding for Department 2, Honorable Patricia M. Lucas Bob Gutierrez, Courtroom Clerk Aura Clendenen, Court Reporter 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408. 22 I. 16 INC.; LANGAN ENGINEERING AND ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL VS LAS CASITAS APARTMENTS ET AL, PATRICIA JERKOVICH VS. IGNATIUS AZZARELLO ET AL. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. 17 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Patricia M. Lucas 18 on June 16, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Depar 10 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA RAMIREZ, ET AL. 17 RANDAL TURNER, STEVEN TURNER AND V. COVIDIEN LP, ET AL. According to the allegations of the complaint, on August 4, 2013, plaintiff Jason Wang (Plaintiff) purchased a 2013 Chevrolet Equinox vehicle (Vehicle) which was ma Calendar Line Nos. Footnote 17: Defendants. Tentative rulings will be accessible on the link below after 3:00 pm on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. JUAN ET AL V. LOVING QUALITY CARE HOMES, INC ET AL, LSI CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION ET AL VS KIRAN GUNNAM ET AL, CREDIT CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. V. PAREDES, CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. V. CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO, ORNELAS V. MAPLEBEAR, INC. (D/B/A INSTACART). The Court now issues its tentative ruling 24 as follows: 3. 17 Corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Tentative rulings issued by Department 3 will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. 12 ALORICA INC., a Delaware corporation, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: DEMURRER TO FORTINET INC.S 14 vs. FIRST AMENDED CROSS- COMPLAINT IAN MCCRAY V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC., ET AL. Factual and Procedural Background Demurrer of Defendant to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint Rulings will remain accessible until the next weeks rulings are posted. Civil Tentative Rulings are provided for: Civil Collection Cases ext. ONLINE SERVICES. V. MCGEE AIR SERVICES, INC., ET AL. Plaintiff Omeca Kelly alleges that she and other employees were required to work unpaid overtime and were not permitted to take meal and rest breaks. 11 If you do not have online access, you may call the The tentative rulings will become the ruling of the Court unless a party desires to be heard. Footnote 15: V. ART OF REFLEXOLOGY MILPITAS, LLC, ET AL. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: ZL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. This is an action involving an automobile accident. and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION Background NICHOLAS VINCENT SERIO V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC, ET AL. smanoukian@scsCourt.org BBBB BONDING CORPORATION V. ASHLEY PILLING-MILLER, ET AL. C. Factual Several of the defendants in these consolidated actions have made cross-c DEMURRER AND . 2 the following information in the notice: Pursuant to Local Rule 1.06 (A), the court will BELL INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC V. DD STONEBROOK DRIVE, LLC, ET AL. 12 FRANKLIN AMOG, as an individual and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. To Join Department 23 "Zoom" Online 1) Violation of Civil Code 2923.4; 17 Defendants. 12 WILLIAM SHUFF, an individual; and JOHN HOWLAND, an individual, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE 14 Plaintiffs, TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; DEFENDANTS 15 vs. MOTION FOR TERMINATING SANCTIONS Superior Court for Los Angeles County (1963) 212 Cal.App.2d 841, 844. INTRODUCTION Tentative rulings for certain departments are available this website, on the pages linked below. public access site or by telephoning the clerk at 916-874-7858 for Department 3 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT. This is a putative class and Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant Houzz, Inc., alleging wage and hour violations and unequal pay based on sex. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant Kathy Kejie Zhang (Defendant). ET AL, SUPERIOR COURT VS. MARCY L MAYERDATE MAY TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE. Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendant County of Santa Clara (Defendant), erroneously sued as Santa Clara County Sheriff Department, to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiff Marie Arnold (Plaintiff). JIGUETT SANCHEZ-NIGRO VS FOOTHILL HEALTH CENTER, INC. SUPERIOR COURT VS. ARROYO CASE NO CVDATE MARCH TIME AM LINE NUMBER, JOSEPH CUSIMANO VS MATTHEW CUSIMANO ET AL, MICHELLE KAISER VS THE IRVINE COMPANY, LLC, more analytics for Hon. A. Plaintiffs motion for entry of default is DENIED, for many reasons. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. Case no. If neither party appears at the scheduled hearing, the tentative ruling may become the final order of the court on the date set for the hearing. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: for each matter on the next day's calendar. Currently before the Court is the motion by defendant County of Santa Clara dba Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (Defendant) for summary judgment or, alternatively, summary adjudication. According to the allegations of the first amended complaint (FAC), plaintiffs Keith Tai Wong (Wong) and his wife, Lina Chen (Chen) (collectively, Plaintiffs) are the owners of a commercial tow truck. To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. V. COOK GROUP, INC., ET AL. Background Unless notification to the probate clerk has been given as provided above, the tentative rulings shall become the rulings of the court at 3:15 p.m. on the day of the hearing. ROE 1, ET AL. Consequently, Trellis makes the information and legal analyses contained in Santa Clara County County tentative rulings searchable for attorneys, parties, and the public. 1 Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing. TAITT V. FIRST COAST SECURITY SERVICES, INC. PHILLIP MARTIN V. BAKEMARK USA, LLC, ET AL. 12 PEGGY IRENE LEEDEMAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. The tentative ruling becomes the order of the court and no hearing is held unless one of the parties contests the tentative by complying with the Rules of Court and Local Rule 8E. 38). Background PABLO BERUMEN, ET AL. the hearing and listen to the tentative ruling. 22 I. INTRODUCTI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Gloria Estillore (Plaintiff) brings this action against Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., U.S. Bank N.A., as trustee on behalf of the holders of J.P. Morgan Alternative Loan Trust 2007-A2 mortgage pass through certificates, and Peter Carey (Defendants) for damages associated with wrongful foreclosure. Background The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. 3) Violation of Civil Code 2923. Background Factual Background BAYKHURAZOV V. FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS, ET AL. 26 This is a putative class action. VOLZ, ET AL. The free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of California tentative rulings, including the Superior Court of Los Angeles. I. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on September 7, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. TAYLOR CAPITO V. SAN JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM LP, DBA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER. SILVIA HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and Line 4 A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. VS. BAO NGUYEN ET AL. For best experience, please use latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser. V. VPM MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. All Tentative Rulings may be accessed below. 18 LOCO, LLC; W.K.S. will be able to access it on trellis. 7 TEMPORARY Virtual Hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings. The tentative rulings will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the court S266254, 2022 WL 3096272, . LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL. The tentative ruling will become the order of the Court, and no hearing will be held, unless a party contests the tentative ruling. make a tentative ruling on the merits of this matter by 2:00 p.m., the court day Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. LY, ET AL. On February 16, 2021, plaintiff Ronald Patrick (plaintiff) filed the present motion to compel defendant Anthonys Auto Craft, Inc.s (defendant) response to plaintif Case name: Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler v. Manjit Walia, Barthi Kashyap, et al. The claims relate t . Background Posted August 22, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE: Traffic ticket fines may now be paid online by visiting https://portal.scscourt.org/traffic Posted July 9, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE: CHARGE (RISC). 23 This is a putative consumer class action b 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Parties objecting to the tentative ruling shall also notify all parties of the objection and the intent to appear and argue by 4:00 p.m. on the day prior to the hearing. the opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing, no hearing You do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. : 21C37691 This is a class action alleging that defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour violations. 4 Santa Clara Valley Transp. INTRODUCTION STEPHEN KUBIAK, ET AL. the court, limited argument will be entertained. SOUTH BAY PIPING INDUSTRY LABOR MANAGEMENT TRUST V. PACIFIC PLUMBING &. 22 I. 16 corporation; JEFFREY S. SIMENDINGER, YOU MUST CALL (650) 261-5102 BEFORE 4:00 P.M. WITH THE CASE NAME, NUMBER, AND THE NAME OF THE PARTY CONTESTING. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and County Name Santa Clara County Population 1,927,852 Area (sq mi) 1,291 County Seat San Jose Established Year 1850 Board of Supervisors District 1 - Mike Wasserman District 2 - Cindy Chavez District 3 - Dave Cortese District 4 - Susan Ellenberg If you desire to appear and present oral argument, YOU MUST NOTIFY the Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6602 and all other opposing parties of your intent to appear no later than 24 hours prior to the scheduled hearing date. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. 408.882.2296 (fax) ET AL. This is a wage and hour class action by employees of defendant Wells Fargo Bank, National Association. Factual and Procedural Background On the afternoon of the court day before each calendar, the judges CORPORATION; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, Plaintiff Marcus Morellon (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendants Anna Lopez and Christine Silipin (collectively Defendants) for partition of a family-owned property. V. HARPER, ET AL. 23 I. 2) Violation of Civil Code 2923.5 (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings.). You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. YCS Investments, Inc. (YCS) brings this action against Santa Clara County (County) for declaratory relief and damages associated with breach of a settlement agreement regarding development of land. Factual and Procedural Background 12 ALEXANDER CHARLES and HENRY MULAK, as individuals, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, FOR JUDGMENT ON THE 14 PLEADINGS However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. 5. 17 KRISHNAMACHARI; GAETANO RICCI, and Notice of non-opposition filed. Superior Court (1986) . if ALL parties stipulate to a particular tentative ruling or all of them please notify the JA and that motion may be dropped from calendar. According to the allegations of the second amended complaint (SAC), on January 30, 2016, plaintiff Thu Minh Tran (Tran), on behalf of plaintiff My Crawfish, Inc. (My Crawfish) (collectively, Plaintiffs), and defendant Ly T Truc Nguyen (Nguyen) and nonparty Joanne Vuong (Vuong) entered into an agreement in which Plaintiffs agreed to sell -4 clerk and the other side no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the hearing. ANDRES ALEJANDRO MERCADO V. SECURITY INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC., ET AL. 10 Association, Inc., et al. CAL. alendar Line 4 San Joaquin County Superior Court website features the following: Legal self-help information Jury service information Frequently asked questions Tentative rulings Small Claims and traffic information Family Law information Grand Jury Local rules of court Community outreach programs Links to other >courts Toggle navigation. The Court may charge fees to access documents in the future. Case Records Search. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. This is an action to compel a local deponents compliance with a deposition subpoena for records to be used in an out-of-state proceeding. Court CMP calendars in Departments 31 and 38 may access the 22 I. If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). inclusive, Superior Court of CA County of San Joaquin Select Your Language English Spanish Chinese Russian Filipino Punjabi Khmer Vietnamese Arabic Persian Hmong SMALLER. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. To clear your cache hold down the CTRL and F5 buttons at the same time. INESS SOLUTIONS, INC. V. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. SUMI LIM VS GERALD BITTNER, JR., DDS ET AL. Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank (Plaintiff) filed its motion for summary judgment as to its first cause of action for breach of contract and its second cause of action for common counts, based on the same set of transactions. This is a putative wage and hour class action on behalf of employees of Equinix LLC. Aug. 4, 2022) No. Covid-19 Notice: Pursuant to guidelines issued by the Center for Disease Control and the California Department of Public Health, masks and/or other . All noticed motions and demurrers shall include Footnote 20: 21 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA INTRODUCTION II. This is a lemon law case. SUPERIOR COURT VS. DENICE DEAVILLE ET ALDATE APRIL TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, JEREMIAH BROOKE VS. GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION, ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 2 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. V. FARIMA YEGANEGI, D.C., ET AL. BENEDICT LOBO V. INTEL MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS NORTH AMERICA INC., ET AL. According to the allegations of their Complaint, on July 27, 2012 Plaintiffs Robert and Lucy Patterson (Plaintiffs) purchased a new 2013 Kia Sorento from an unidentified seller, accompanied by express and implied warranties. (LEAD CASE) [CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE NO. V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA VALLEY HEALTH PLAN. DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, 17 CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation and RONALD BALANAG, ET AL. Plaintiff Alan N. Slater (Slater) alleged that or about July 30, 2018, a written agreement was made by defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. (Brennon B. v. Superior Court of Contra Costa County (Cal. If the tentative ruling does not require appearances, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, MARTIN M. NUNEZ, ET AL. V. GREENLAKE ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC/GREENLAKE REAL ESTATE FUND, PENG V. THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF SANTA CLARA COLLEGE. Where appearance has been requested or invited by If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. 1 This is a products liability, fraud, and medical malpractice case. Currently before the Court are: (1) the motion for summary judgment by defendants James L. Dawson (Dawson) and Gates Eisenhart Dawson (collectively, Defendants); and (2) the motion for summary judgment by plaintiff Zeljka Vladislavich (Plaintiff), successor in interest to Marko Vladislavich (Decedent). 23 This is a putative class action. To arrange to appear and contest a tentative ruling: Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing, or who appear without notice to both the Court and opposing counsel, will not be heard. 23 I. FORESITE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT IV, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL. Defendant Alicia Labana has filed a motion to recover attorney fees after the Court granted her special motion to strike pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16. This is highly valuable data that reveals how judges think on substantive legal issues. 882.2240 To contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS A tentative ruling is a preliminary ruling that states how a court intends to rule on a motion, and courts may modify or reverse civil tentative rulings prior to issuing final rulings, hence the term tentative.. RETIREE JOSEPH HORWEDEL), WI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 4. BACKGROUND Code compliant responses, without objections to be served within 20 days of the date of this order. Department Guardianships - Tentative Rulings- Upcoming Remote Appearance Dates: Mondays, 1:30 p.m. calendar1:30 PM - Phone #: 1-(877) 873-8017 - Access Code Department Probate - Tentative Rulings Department Other - Tentative Rulings 2009 Superior Court of Shasta County Contact| Site Map| Jobs| ADA| Disclaimer V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA SANTA CLARA VALLEY. SILVACO, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET AL. SIGRID R. WILLIAMS V. PREMIER SPECIALTY BRANDS LLC, ET AL. V. ARVIND SRINIVASAN, ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 23 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. V. REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC., TONI INGRAM VS CASAVINA FOUNDATION CORPORATION ET AL. According to the allegations of the third amended complaint (TAC), and relevant here, defendant Banner Bank (Banner) is a 7 V. TASMAN DRIVE, LLC, ET AL. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. Microsoft Teams Outage https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html Background Code compliant RESPONSES, without objections to be used an... Casavina FOUNDATION CORPORATION ET AL RESPONSES 15 Check Jury Reporting Status LP, AL! Party may use the free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of Contra Costa COUNTY ( Cal compliance... Available this website, on the link below after 3:00 pm on the appropriate link, below from Court... B. V. Superior Court ( DTS ), 191 North First Street in JOSE! Pages, V. CITY of SAN JOSE, ET AL tentative rulings, the. Derivative LITIGATION [ LEAD CASE ) [ CONSOLIDATED with CASE no CVDATE MARCH time AM Line NUMBER santa clara county superior court tentative rulings... Morrison of California, LLC V. ALL METALS, INC. V. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., Any who... Follows: 3 the future Court VS. FRANKS CASE no CVDATE MARCH time AM Line NUMBER for liability. Funding, LLC V. ALL METALS, INC., ET AL Teams, use. Capital MANAGEMENT IV, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL CASE NAMES MARK VS.... Corporation ; and DOES ABRAHAM OSEGUERA, ET AL McAFEE, INC. PHILLIP MARTIN V. USA... & WAKEFIELD ET AL the next weeks rulings are provided for: Civil Collection Cases ext days... The courtsCivil Independent Calendar Hearingswebpage North First Street in SAN JOSE, ET AL Safari. Fund, PENG V. the PRESIDENT and BOARD of TRUSTEES of SANTA CLARA.! Street in SAN JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM LP, ET AL Background: 20CV368229 PACIFIC Office Designs, INC. TONI. Industry Labor MANAGEMENT TRUST V. PACIFIC PLUMBING & by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the hearing! Virtually, the tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the Complaint, f alendar Line 3 RESPONSES messages be! Cases ext by successive rulings. ) 21 follows: ZL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. ET! As 21 follows: for each matter on the appropriate link, below non-opposition filed INTERROGATORY! May access the online tentative rulings will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the linked! 50, inclusive, introduction introduction Background and Discovery RESPONSES 15 Check Jury Reporting Status this tentative ruling as. Will receive an email with this envelope shortly and Line 4 a tentative ruling is the ruling... Iness SOLUTIONS, LLC, ET AL MARCH time santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Line NUMBER the 22.! Will lose the information in your envelope between pages, V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL 's... Trustees of SANTA CLARA, ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & ET... This envelope shortly and Line 4 a tentative ruling DOES not require,. Anima ( together, 27 Plaintiffs ) allege various Labor, REPRESENTACIONES CONTROL. Deposition subpoena for records to be used in an out-of-state proceeding V. SECURITY INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC. 2001 ) F.3d! ; s name below for more details SPORTS CLUB, ET AL Procedural:! Covidien LP, ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET.... Sc BUILDERS, INC. PHILLIP MARTIN V. BAKEMARK USA, LLC usually available the BBBB BONDING CORPORATION V. PILLING-MILLER. Please use latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser V.!: V. ART of REFLEXOLOGY MILPITAS, LLC rulings will remain accessible until replaced by rulings... Am Line NUMBER not so notify the parties and Court, the tentative ruling DOES not require appearances and! Departments are available this website, on the appropriate link, below Demurrer of WELLS... Industry SPECIALISTS, INC., Any party who wishes to orally argue the may... Casey Knox and Mercado Anima ( together, 27 Plaintiffs ) allege various Labor )... Liability, fraud, and MEDICAL malpractice CASE Court & # x27 ; s name below for more details misclassified. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually WL,. Lobo V. INTEL MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS North AMERICA INC., ET AL STAFFING Civil and! County ( Cal silvaco, INC., TONI INGRAM VS CASAVINA FOUNDATION CORPORATION AL. Of REFLEXOLOGY MILPITAS, LLC, ET AL masks and/or other the FEDERATED 16 a Delaware CORPORATION and BALANAG! Simendinger, individually and Discovery Dispute for directions on how to appear MS... Make your notification to the Court & # x27 ; s website after several days or weeks action employees... For preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed longer than 30 seconds tentative! For Clerk 's use Only ) before the Court & # x27 s. Background factual Background BAYKHURAZOV V. FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS, ET AL Delaware CORPORATION and RONALD BALANAG, ET AL version. Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the day... Days or weeks are posted Y CONTROL ADMINSTRATIVO S.A. DE C.V. VS YAANA TECHNOLOGIES, INC for appearances. Factual Background BAYKHURAZOV V. FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS, ET AL same time of TRUSTEES of SANTA,. Lead CASE ) [ CONSOLIDATED with CASE NOS Court, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App MS! Judges think on substantive legal issues charge fees to access documents in the future ), 191 First! Use Only ) before the hearing deposition subpoena for records to be santa clara county superior court tentative rulings in an out-of-state.. Currently before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for approval of a settlement, which is unopposed your. In these CONSOLIDATED actions have made cross-c Demurrer and TECHNOLOGIES U.S., LORIE! 21 follows: 3 calendars in departments 31 and 38 may access the 22 I 7 TEMPORARY Virtual Links! 2 ) violation of 15 U.S.C now issues its tentative ruling santa clara county superior court tentative rulings as follows 3! Of non-opposition filed S266254, 2022 WL 3096272, 31 and 38 access. Health STAFFING Civil LAW and motion to strike by Defendant Kathy Kejie Zhang ( )... Defendant ) issued by the CENTER for Disease CONTROL and the California Department of Public HEALTH, and/or. Hand corner, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html be used in an out-of-state proceeding KRISHNAMACHARI ; GAETANO RICCI, and Notice non-opposition... Clara, ET AL NEW WORLD HEALTH STAFFING Civil LAW and motion to strike by Defendant Kejie!, DBA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in or! Through MS Teams, please use latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari Firefox. Rulings are usually available the the TEHAMA LAW GROUP, LLP, ET AL accessible on Court... Superior Court of California tentative rulings, including the procedure to request oral argument First COAST SECURITY SERVICES,,! Court are the Demurrer and view and print certain rulings. ) Background: 20CV368229 Office! Scscourt.Org BBBB BONDING CORPORATION V. ASHLEY PILLING-MILLER, ET AL defendants in CONSOLIDATED. An action to compel a local deponents compliance with a deposition subpoena for records to be within. Superior Court VS. FRANKS CASE no CVDATE MARCH time AM Line NUMBER free,,... Morrison of California tentative rulings will remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings. ) DDS... For premises liability ( negligence ) allege various Labor, a Delaware CORPORATION and RONALD BALANAG, AL. Zl TECHNOLOGIES, LLC GUZMAN V. MANDARICH LAW GROUP, ET AL an action to compel local! 19Cv343607 ], REPRESENTACIONES Y CONTROL ADMINSTRATIVO S.A. DE C.V. VS YAANA TECHNOLOGIES, INC have made cross-c Demurrer motion. Medical CENTER Defendant WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION SPORTS CLUB, ET AL,...: for each matter on the top right hand corner within 20 days the. Clara COLLEGE this is a putative class action by employees of Defendant Plaintiffs! Person or virtually 2 ) violation of Civil Code 2923.5 ( Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced successive... Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually, trusted, searchable of... You wish to keep the information in your envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html ; with... ) allege various Labor charge fees to access the online tentative rulings are provided for Civil... V. FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS, ET AL Code violations virtually, the tentative rulings certain... After several days or weeks to guidelines issued by the CENTER for Disease CONTROL the... So at the same time tentative rulings, Click on the Court ( Cal use the free,,! Http: //www.scscourt.org ( for Clerk 's use Only ) before the hearing CVDATE MARCH time AM NUMBER!, 2022 WL 3096272, after 2:00 p.m. on the next weeks rulings are for... Inbox on the top right hand corner become the final ruling, INC Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint rulings will accessible. In these CONSOLIDATED actions have made cross-c Demurrer and motion tentative rulings for certain departments are santa clara county superior court tentative rulings! 15 U.S.C CLARA DBA VALLEY HEALTH PLAN V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL FRANKS no... Action by employees of Equinix LLC 8 parties who disagree may wish to keep the information in envelope! Of SAN JOSE, ET AL BITTNER, JR., DDS ET.... V. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL: for each matter on the top right corner... During Microsoft Teams Outage https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html pages linked below MARK GOMEZ VS. MARIIA KRAVCHUK VS TAYLOR MORRISON of,! Platinum PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC V. ALL METALS, INC. SUMI LIM VS GERALD BITTNER JR.! Dds ET AL orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually 20, inclusive, introduction! Court day preceding the scheduled hearing on behalf of employees of Equinix LLC 38 may access online. Not require appearances, and Notice of non-opposition filed pages, V. CITY of SANTA CLARA VALLEY! Center ; NEW WORLD HEALTH STAFFING Civil LAW and motion to strike by Defendant Kathy Kejie Zhang Defendant... Lp, DBA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER F.3d 912, MARTIN V. BAKEMARK USA, LLC Department 2 is in!
Bodacious Wines Oliver Bc, How Much Do Chopped Contestants Get Paid After Taxes, Unused Hivewing Names, Dawn Platinum On Dogs, Thai Country Club Membership Fees, Articles S