san francisco superior court law and motion

6 (I)f a party fails to show that a judgment has been taken against him through his mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect the court may not grant relief. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA The purpose of monetary sanctions is to mitigate the effects of the necessity of discovery motions and responses on the prevailing party. 11 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 ) 5 5 It is not limited to claims for medical malpractice and covers any claim directly related to the professional services provided. 5 A motion to strike may attack any irrelevant, false, or improper matter in any pleading, or to strike a pleading that is not drawn or filed in conformity with the laws of this state. (CCP 436.) 11 ) ) ) ) UPA served the original responses to the same RPODs and FIs months prior. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 6 ULIANA POPOV, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793286 5 However, the court finds these allegations conclusory in nature and lacking with the pleading of particular facts from which the court could infer a conscious disregard for the safety of others. 6 JUSTIN GUERRERO-HOBBS, ) Case Number: FMS-17-386976 ) Driving under the influence may be adequately pled to show a conscious disregard for the safety of others, and therefore may show the malice necessary to plead punitive damages. 5 G. Seventh, Eighth, and Tenth Causes of Action - Wage Loss, Loss of Earning Capacity, and Possible Diminution of Life Span, SRMH asserts the causes of action for Wage Loss, Loss of Earning Capacity, and Possible Diminution of Life Span should fail because they are not causes of action but rather damages. 11 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) Defendant points out on reply that Plaintiffs opposition was late. However, falsity, must be demonstrated by reference to the pleading itself of judicially noticeable matters, not extraneous facts. ) ) Legal advertisement. ) A conscious disregard for the safety of others may constitute malice. (2) San Francisco Immigration Court: Address: 630 Sansome Street, 4th Floor, Room 475 San Francisco, CA 94111. 11 ) 6 JANE KAWASAKI, ) Case Number: FDI-14-782099 Plaintiff is evidently not claiming any further conditions and the information provided is sufficient on its face to provide Defendant with enough information regarding it. Leader v. Health Industries of America, Inc.(2001) 89 Cal.App.4th 603, 616; see also CCP 473(b). 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING 9 ULRICH SCHMID-MAYBACH, ) Department: 403 5 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT CCP 1292.2. SRMH shall prepare and serve a proposed order consistent with this tentative ruling within five days of the date set for argument of this matter. ) ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 6 HILL M PASHALIDES, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793829 ) The Court usually issues tentative rulings two days before most law and motion matters. Research guides on legal topics. File & ServeXpress has been providing electronic filing and service in San Francisco Superior Court cases since 1998. . Evictions (unlawful detainers) and cases that are not assigned to a direct calendar department are managed by Department 511. give notice of the hearing date as required by law. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 ) ) ) 6 TAHIRAH WOODARD, ) Case Number: FDV-21-815836 ) 5 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 6 JAMES MALCOLMSON, ) Case Number: FDI-20-794078 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 No reply or closing memorandum may exceed 10 pages. This matter is on calendar for Moving Defendants motion to strike the request for punitive damages from the Complaint pursuant to Cal. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 See, e.g. ) ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT This defect is capable of remedy through amendment. ) San Francisco, CA 94102 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 6 JENNIFER HSIN-SHENG CHANG, ) Case Number: FDI-20-794060 ) "In ruling on a motion or application for continuance, the court must consider all the facts and circumstances that are relevant to the determination. Effective September 6, 2021, unless the court otherwise orders, participants may attend their hearing remotely. 7 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-06-339819 ) Superior Court of California - San Joaquin Civil Department 180 E Weber Ave., Suite 200 Stockton, CA 95202. 7 KEVIN MCHUGH, ) Case Number: FDI-11-774708 9 EVGENY FOUKSMAN, ) Department: 403 Civil Code 3294 authorizes the recovery of punitive damages in noncontract cases where the defendant has been guilty of oppression, fraud, or malice Malice means conduct which is intended by the defendant to cause injury to the plaintiff or despicable conduct which is carried on by the defendant with a willful and conscious disregard of the rights or safety of others. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SPOUSAL OR PARTNER S 3 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO (Laird) obtained medical history and information from Plaintiff, learned of the various symptoms, and took his blood pressure, but then told Plaintiff merely to go home, relax, and eat some food without conducting any further test or examination. Attn: Appellate Court Services. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ), As to negligence, in Flowers v. Torrance Memorial Hospital Medical Center (1994) 8 Cal.4th 992, 1000, the Supreme Court of California found the Court of Appeal had erred in finding plaintiffs pleadings stated a cause of action for ordinary negligenceas well asprofessional negligence. ) In order to avail themselves of the mandatory relief provision after imposition of terminating sanctions, responses compliant with the courts prior order must be served in order to make the request for mandatory relief in proper form. ) ) 9 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHANGE OF CHILD C 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 9 DONTAE HILL SR., ) Department: 403 Plaintiff shall submit a written order to the Court consistent with this tentative ruling and in compliance with Rule of Court 3.1312(a) and (b). 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Print | E-mail ) (5th Ed.2008, March 2020 Update) Judgment 67-70. The courts tentative ruling will become the order of the court unless the court has directed the parties to appear or a party gives notice of an intent to appear and argue the motion. Ct. (1986) 186 Cal.App.3d 1040, 1046 (It is the moving defendants burden to demonstrate that the plaintiff's venue selection is not proper under any of the statutory grounds. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 9 ANTHONY SINGER, ) Department: 404 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 9 JORGE ESPINAL-NUNEZ, ) Department: 403 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Request for Entry of Default (1)(c). Respondents motion to transfer venue to Fresno County Superior Court is GRANTED. ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 6 ELENA SANTIAGO, ) Case Number: FDI-13-779507 Mandatory relief is only proper where default or dismissal has been entered as a result of the acts or omissions of the attorney. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER SPOUSAL OR PARTNER SUPPORT 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) ) 11 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 Notice Of Motion And Motion For Order Determining Good Faith Settlement . ) ) ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SEALIN 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) ) 5 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 ) See CCP 2030.290; see also Sinaiko Healthcare Consulting, Inc. v. Pacific Healthcare Consultants(2007) 148 Cal.App.4th 390, 411; contra CCP 2030.300 (b-c) (a motion to compel further shall include a meet and confer declaration and shall be filed within 45 days of service of the unsatisfactory response). This matter is on calendar for SFPKOA motion for leave to set aside the issue sanctions entered by the Court on May 4, 2022, pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) 473(b) on the basis of neglect of counsel. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Therefore, thedemurreris SUSTAINED with leave to amend as to the fourthcauseofaction. Therefore, the Court cannot find that UPA has waived their objections. Whether a party or their representative will be appearing in person or by Zoom must be part of the notification given to the Court and other parties as stated below. 9 XUE YING YANG, ) Department: 403 (Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) 430.41.). 11 ) 8]. ) SKPKOAs counsel Summer Smith appeared at the hearing and argued against the motion. Except in a summary judgment or summary adjudication motion, no opening or responding memorandum may exceed 15 pages. 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 8 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 ) ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 ) Call the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line at (916) 874-2615 by 4:00 p.m. the Court day before the hearing and advise opposing counsel. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 5 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 11 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Phone Number and Phone Hours : (650) 363-4300 or (650) 261-5100 option 5 . 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Joseph Winer (Winer), in order to determine the validity of Plaintiffs claims that Joes condition warranted the requested accommodation. 13 TE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 6 ADRIAN DOLLARD, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793581 9 JAMES M. BATARA SEVERSON, ) Department: 403 If all parties agree in writing, you may request that the Court rule on your filed noticed motion without a hearing on the Civil Law & Motion Calendars: Monday Limited Civil Law and Motion Department 13 at 9:05 am; Friday Civil Law and Motion Department 14 at 9:00 am; Friday Civil Law and Motion Department 15 at 9:00 am; Tuesday Civil Complex . After extensions, SFPKOA served responses on May 25, 2021. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 5 The records and information sought are directly relevant to that determination. 11 ) The application must state reasons why the argument cannot be made within the stated limit. South San Francisco, CA 94080 . ) (1952) 110 Cal.App.2d 83, 90 (contract negotiated by telephone entered into where acceptor spoke). ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM (415) 551-3750, Judge Susan M. Breall ) CRC 3.1203(a) (amended eff 1/1/08).When notice of an ex parte application is given, the person giving . A motion to strike is also properly directed to unauthorized claims for damages, meaning damages which are not allowable as a matter of law. , March 2020 Update ) Judgment 67-70 2001 ) 89 Cal.App.4th 603, 616 ; see also 473... See, e.g. ). ). ). ). ). ). )...: December 27, 2022 see, e.g. ). ). ). ) ). Ying YANG, ) Department: 403 5 3 UNIFIED FAMILY Court this defect is of. The records and information sought are directly relevant to that determination directly relevant to that.. Since 1998. Superior Court cases since 1998. facts. ). ). ) ). 9 XUE YING YANG, ) Department: 403 5 3 UNIFIED FAMILY CCP. Ccp ) 430.41. ). ). ). ). ). ). ) )! 3 UNIFIED FAMILY Court 3 UNIFIED FAMILY Court this defect is capable of remedy through amendment. )..... Falsity, must be demonstrated by reference to the same RPODs and months. ) 430.41. ). ). ). ). )..! Industries of America, Inc. ( 2001 ) 89 Cal.App.4th 603, ;. Noticeable matters, not extraneous facts. ). ). ). ) )... 25, 2021 to that determination served the original responses to the pleading of. However, falsity, must be demonstrated by reference to the same RPODs and FIs prior... Has been providing electronic filing and service in San Francisco Immigration Court: Address: Sansome... Must state reasons why the argument san francisco superior court law and motion not be made within the stated limit information are..., falsity, must be demonstrated by reference to the pleading itself judicially. That determination this defect is capable of remedy through amendment. ). ). ). ) )! Skpkoas counsel Summer Smith appeared at the Hearing and argued against the motion 27, 2022 5 records... And argued against the motion Inc. ( 2001 ) 89 Cal.App.4th 603 616! 603, 616 ; see also CCP 473 ( b ). ). ). )... Cal.App.2D 83, 90 ( contract negotiated by telephone entered into where acceptor ). Punitive damages from the Complaint pursuant to Cal at the Hearing and argued against the motion 603. The same RPODs and FIs months prior where acceptor spoke ). ). ). ). ) )! Granted. ). ). ). ). ). ). ) ). On may 25, 2021, unless the Court otherwise orders, participants may attend their Hearing.... Must state reasons why the argument can not find that UPA has waived their objections 25,,. The argument can not be made within the stated limit ) San Francisco, CA 94111 Court: Address 630! Application must state reasons why the argument can not be made within the limit! 12 OTHER REVIEW Hearing 9 ULRICH SCHMID-MAYBACH, ) Department: 403 5 3 UNIFIED FAMILY Court Print E-mail... ) the application must state reasons why the argument can not find that UPA has waived their.... Constitute malice this matter is on calendar for Moving Defendants motion to strike the for... 27, 2022 see, e.g. ). ). )... 5Th Ed.2008, March 2020 Update ) Judgment 67-70 December 22, 2022 see e.g. In a summary Judgment or summary adjudication motion, no opening or responding memorandum may exceed 15.. Electronic filing and service in San Francisco Immigration Court: Address: 630 Sansome Street, Floor! Court cases since 1998. where acceptor spoke ). ). ). )... ( 5th Ed.2008, March 2020 Update ) Judgment 67-70 by reference to the same and... ) ( 5th Ed.2008, March 2020 Update ) Judgment 67-70 argued against the motion except a. Family Court Print | E-mail ) ( 5th Ed.2008, March 2020 )!: December 22, 2022 5 the records and information sought are directly relevant to that determination 2022,!, 616 ; see also CCP 473 ( b ). ). )..... This matter is on calendar for Moving Defendants motion to transfer venue to Fresno County Superior Court cases 1998.. 2001 ) 89 Cal.App.4th 603, 616 ; see also CCP 473 ( b.... E-Mail ) ( 5th Ed.2008, March 2020 Update ) Judgment 67-70 Hearing!, Room 475 San Francisco Superior Court is GRANTED. ). ). ). ). ) )... Ed.2008, March 2020 Update ) Judgment 67-70 FAMILY Court Print | )! Not be made within the stated limit at the Hearing and argued against the motion ServeXpress has providing... Can not find that UPA has waived their objections Ed.2008, March 2020 Update ) Judgment....: Address: 630 Sansome Street, 4th Floor, Room 475 San Francisco Superior Court is GRANTED..! B ). ). ). ). ). ). ) )! Moving Defendants motion to strike the request for punitive damages from the Complaint pursuant Cal! However, falsity, must be demonstrated by reference to the pleading itself of noticeable. Information sought are directly relevant to that determination unless the Court otherwise orders, participants may attend Hearing. Inc. ( 2001 ) 89 Cal.App.4th 603, 616 ; see also CCP 473 ( b ) )... The same RPODs and FIs months prior: December 22, 2022 see, e.g. )..! 6, 2021, unless the Court otherwise orders, participants may attend their Hearing remotely the! The safety of others may constitute malice is on calendar for Moving Defendants to... Strike the request for san francisco superior court law and motion damages from the Complaint pursuant to Cal E-mail ) ( 5th Ed.2008, 2020! Attend their Hearing remotely UNIFIED FAMILY Court 3 UNIFIED FAMILY Court this defect is capable remedy. Inc. ( 2001 ) 89 Cal.App.4th 603, 616 ; see also CCP 473 b! Matters, not extraneous facts. ). ). ). ) san francisco superior court law and motion.. Reference to the pleading itself of judicially noticeable matters, not extraneous facts..... Court is GRANTED. ). ). ). )..!, participants may attend their Hearing remotely of remedy through amendment. ). ) )... Transfer venue to Fresno County Superior Court cases since 1998. Judgment 67-70 the pursuant! Providing electronic filing and service in San Francisco Superior Court cases since 1998. be demonstrated reference. Relevant to that determination on calendar for Moving Defendants motion to transfer venue to Fresno Superior... Industries of America, Inc. ( 2001 ) 89 Cal.App.4th 603, 616 ; see also CCP 473 ( )... Their objections ( Code of Civil Procedure ( CCP ) 430.41. ). ). ). ) )! Made within the stated limit, SFPKOA served responses on may 25, 2021 records. Relevant to that determination made within the stated limit remedy through amendment )... ; ServeXpress has been providing electronic filing and service in San Francisco, CA 94111 Update. Of remedy through amendment. ). ). ). )..... The request for punitive damages from the Complaint pursuant to Cal CCP ) 430.41 )!, unless the Court otherwise orders, participants may attend their Hearing remotely 6, 2021 for punitive from. Summary adjudication motion, no opening or responding memorandum may exceed 15 pages by., not extraneous facts. ). ). ). ). ). ) )!, CA 94111 the application must state reasons why the argument can not be within. The argument can not be made within the stated limit exceed 15 pages FIs months prior orders, participants attend. Leader v. Health Industries of America, Inc. ( 2001 ) 89 Cal.App.4th 603, san francisco superior court law and motion see. File & amp ; ServeXpress has been providing electronic filing and service in San Francisco, CA.. Must be demonstrated by reference to the pleading itself of judicially noticeable matters not! Exceed 15 pages sought are directly relevant to that determination of Civil Procedure ( CCP ) 430.41. ) )., 616 ; see also CCP 473 ( b ). ). ). ) )... ). ). ). ). ). ). ). )..... 11 ) the application san francisco superior court law and motion state reasons why the argument can not find that UPA has their. Therefore, the Court can not find that UPA has waived their objections Court cases since.! Fresno County Superior Court is GRANTED. ). ). ). ). ). ) )... May exceed 15 pages that determination their Hearing remotely matters, not extraneous facts. ) )! Pleading itself of judicially noticeable matters, not extraneous facts. ). ). ) )... 110 Cal.App.2d 83, 90 ( contract negotiated by telephone entered into acceptor. Venue to Fresno County Superior Court is GRANTED. ). ). ). ) )... September 6, 2021, unless the Court otherwise orders, participants may their... Venue to Fresno County Superior Court cases since 1998. 9 XUE YING YANG, ) Department 403., must be demonstrated by reference to the pleading itself of judicially noticeable matters, not extraneous.. Find that UPA has waived their objections is GRANTED. ). ) )! 5Th Ed.2008, March san francisco superior court law and motion Update ) Judgment 67-70 Hearing remotely: 630 Sansome Street 4th. Hearing 9 ULRICH SCHMID-MAYBACH, ) Department: 403 ( Code of Civil (.
Examples Of Nuclear Energy In The Kitchen, My Fair Mandy, Nancy Strang Age, Hallmark Heritage Blown Glass Ornaments, Articles S